Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 (1M) vs Alibaba Qwen 3 (128k)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 (1M)

by Anthropic
Context: 1M
Input: $5.00 / 1M
Output: $25.00 / 1M
Released: 2026-05
Option B

Alibaba Qwen 3 (128k)

by Alibaba
Context: 128K
Input: $0.80 / 1M
Output: $3.20 / 1M
Released: 2026-01

Detailed Comparison

Dimension Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 (1M) Alibaba Qwen 3 (128k)
Provider Anthropic Alibaba
Context window Winner 1M 128K
Input price ($/1M) Winner $5.00 $0.80
Output price ($/1M) Winner $25.00 $3.20
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$17.50 $2.40
Released Winner 2026-05 2026-01
Tokenizer claude-4 qwen

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Alibaba Qwen 3 (128k) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 (1M) - Key features

Anthropic's most capable Opus-tier model - highly autonomous, state-of-the-art on long-horizon agentic work, knowledge work and memory, with clearer, warmer writing. 1M context at standard pricing.

  • Adaptive thinking + effort (low→max)
  • State-of-the-art long-horizon agents
  • 128K max output tokens
  • 1M token context window
  • Strong code review & debugging

Alibaba Qwen 3 (128k) - Key features

Alibaba's latest Qwen 3 flagship model with strong multilingual capabilities and improved reasoning. Competitive with frontier models at lower cost.

  • 128K context window
  • Strong multilingual support (100+ languages)
  • Advanced reasoning and coding
  • Open-weight model
  • Efficient MoE architecture

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.