Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context) vs Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context)

by Anthropic
Context:1M
Input:$6.00 / 1M
Output:$30.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)

by Anthropic
Context:1M
Input:$3.00 / 1M
Output:$15.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context)Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Context window TieTie1M1M
Input price ($/1M) Winner$6.00$3.00
Output price ($/1M) Winner$30.00$15.00
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$21.00 $10.50
Released TieTie2026-072026-07
Tokenizerclaude-4claude-4

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context) - Key features

The 1M-token context tier of Claude Opus 5. Same model, long-context premium pricing applied to requests above 200K input tokens. Built for whole-repository and whole-corpus work.

  • 1M token context window
  • Whole-repository reasoning
  • Long-context premium tier
  • Prompt caching support
  • Adaptive effort control

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M) - Key features

The workhorse of the Claude 5 family. Sonnet 5 lands close to Opus 4.8 on coding and agentic benchmarks while staying at the long-standing Sonnet price, with a 1M token context window available by default.

  • 1M token context window
  • Near-Opus coding quality
  • Fast time to first token
  • Strong tool use and structured output
  • Batch and caching discounts

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.