Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context) vs Google Gemini 3.6 Flash (1M)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context)

by Anthropic
Context:1M
Input:$6.00 / 1M
Output:$30.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Google Gemini 3.6 Flash (1M)

by Google
Context:1M
Input:$0.50 / 1M
Output:$3.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context)Google Gemini 3.6 Flash (1M)
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Context window TieTie1M1M
Input price ($/1M) Winner$6.00$0.50
Output price ($/1M) Winner$30.00$3.00
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$21.00 $2.00
Released TieTie2026-072026-07
Tokenizerclaude-4gemini

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Google Gemini 3.6 Flash (1M) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context) - Key features

The 1M-token context tier of Claude Opus 5. Same model, long-context premium pricing applied to requests above 200K input tokens. Built for whole-repository and whole-corpus work.

  • 1M token context window
  • Whole-repository reasoning
  • Long-context premium tier
  • Prompt caching support
  • Adaptive effort control

Google Gemini 3.6 Flash (1M) - Key features

The fast, cheap tier of Gemini 3.6. Flash keeps a 1M token window and multimodal input while running several times faster than Pro, which makes it the default choice for high-volume production traffic.

  • 1M token context window
  • Very high throughput
  • Multimodal input (text, image, audio, video)
  • Context caching
  • Thinking budget control

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.