Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context) vs Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Mini (256k)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context)

by Anthropic
Context:1M
Input:$6.00 / 1M
Output:$30.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Mini (256k)

by Moonshot AI
Context:256K
Input:$0.15 / 1M
Output:$0.80 / 1M
Released:2026-07

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context)Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Mini (256k)
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot AI
Context window Winner1M256K
Input price ($/1M) Winner$6.00$0.15
Output price ($/1M) Winner$30.00$0.80
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$21.00 $0.55
Released TieTie2026-072026-07
Tokenizerclaude-4kimi

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Mini (256k) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context) - Key features

The 1M-token context tier of Claude Opus 5. Same model, long-context premium pricing applied to requests above 200K input tokens. Built for whole-repository and whole-corpus work.

  • 1M token context window
  • Whole-repository reasoning
  • Long-context premium tier
  • Prompt caching support
  • Adaptive effort control

Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Mini (256k) - Key features

A distilled K3.7 aimed at classification, extraction and sub-agent duty. Runs comfortably on a single high-memory GPU when self-hosted.

  • Distilled from K3.7
  • 256K token context window
  • Single-GPU friendly
  • Very low cost
  • Open weights

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.