Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context) vs Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context)

by Anthropic
Context:1M
Input:$6.00 / 1M
Output:$30.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k)

by Moonshot AI
Context:512K
Input:$1.20 / 1M
Output:$5.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context)Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k)
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot AI
Context window Winner1M512K
Input price ($/1M) Winner$6.00$1.20
Output price ($/1M) Winner$30.00$5.00
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$21.00 $3.70
Released TieTie2026-072026-07
Tokenizerclaude-4kimi

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context) - Key features

The 1M-token context tier of Claude Opus 5. Same model, long-context premium pricing applied to requests above 200K input tokens. Built for whole-repository and whole-corpus work.

  • 1M token context window
  • Whole-repository reasoning
  • Long-context premium tier
  • Prompt caching support
  • Adaptive effort control

Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k) - Key features

The low-latency hosted tier of Kimi K3.7. Same weights, dedicated high-throughput serving, roughly double the price and a large jump in tokens per second.

  • Turbo serving tier
  • 512K token context window
  • Very high tokens per second
  • Same weights as K3.7
  • Priority capacity

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.