Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context) vs Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context)

by Anthropic
Context:1M
Input:$6.00 / 1M
Output:$30.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M)

by Meta
Context:2M
Input:$1.20 / 1M
Output:$4.00 / 1M
Released:2026-06

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context)Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M)
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Context window Winner1M2M
Input price ($/1M) Winner$6.00$1.20
Output price ($/1M) Winner$30.00$4.00
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$21.00 $3.20
Released Winner2026-072026-06
Tokenizerclaude-4llama

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (1M context) - Key features

The 1M-token context tier of Claude Opus 5. Same model, long-context premium pricing applied to requests above 200K input tokens. Built for whole-repository and whole-corpus work.

  • 1M token context window
  • Whole-repository reasoning
  • Long-context premium tier
  • Prompt caching support
  • Adaptive effort control

Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M) - Key features

Meta's largest released model, positioned against closed frontier systems. Behemoth is served through partners rather than being practical to self-host, and it leads open-weight benchmarks on reasoning and math.

  • Largest open-weight model to date
  • 2M token context window
  • Frontier-level reasoning and math
  • Mixture-of-experts
  • Partner-hosted inference

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.