Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k) vs DeepSeek V4.5 (256k)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k)

by Anthropic
Context:200K
Input:$5.00 / 1M
Output:$25.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

DeepSeek V4.5 (256k)

by DeepSeek
Context:256K
Input:$0.45 / 1M
Output:$1.80 / 1M
Released:2026-06

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k)DeepSeek V4.5 (256k)
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Context window Winner200K256K
Input price ($/1M) Winner$5.00$0.45
Output price ($/1M) Winner$25.00$1.80
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$17.50 $1.35
Released Winner2026-072026-06
Tokenizerclaude-4deepseek

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, DeepSeek V4.5 (256k) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k) - Key features

Anthropic's flagship Opus-class model for July 2026. Opus 5 pairs Mythos-class reasoning with the Opus price point, adds adaptive effort control and a hardened long-horizon agent loop that holds context across day-long tasks.

  • Adaptive effort control (low to max)
  • Best-in-class agentic coding
  • Compaction-aware 200K context
  • Native tool search and skills
  • Interleaved thinking with tool use

DeepSeek V4.5 (256k) - Key features

A mid-cycle refresh of DeepSeek V4 with a doubled context window, better tool calling and a large improvement in multilingual output quality. Still open weights.

  • 256K token context window
  • Improved tool calling
  • Open weights
  • Very low cost per token
  • Mixture-of-experts architecture

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.