Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k) vs Google Gemini 3.6 Pro (2M)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k)

by Anthropic
Context:200K
Input:$5.00 / 1M
Output:$25.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Google Gemini 3.6 Pro (2M)

by Google
Context:2M
Input:$2.00 / 1M
Output:$12.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k)Google Gemini 3.6 Pro (2M)
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Context window Winner200K2M
Input price ($/1M) Winner$5.00$2.00
Output price ($/1M) Winner$25.00$12.00
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$17.50 $8.00
Released TieTie2026-072026-07
Tokenizerclaude-4gemini

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Google Gemini 3.6 Pro (2M) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k) - Key features

Anthropic's flagship Opus-class model for July 2026. Opus 5 pairs Mythos-class reasoning with the Opus price point, adds adaptive effort control and a hardened long-horizon agent loop that holds context across day-long tasks.

  • Adaptive effort control (low to max)
  • Best-in-class agentic coding
  • Compaction-aware 200K context
  • Native tool search and skills
  • Interleaved thinking with tool use

Google Gemini 3.6 Pro (2M) - Key features

Google's flagship Gemini for mid-2026. Gemini 3.6 Pro extends the 2M token window to all paid tiers, improves grounded answers with live Search, and adds native 1 fps video understanding.

  • 2M token context window
  • Native video understanding at 1 fps
  • Grounding with Google Search
  • Context caching for whole corpora
  • Thinking budget control

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.