Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k) vs Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k)

by Anthropic
Context:200K
Input:$5.00 / 1M
Output:$25.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k)

by Moonshot AI
Context:512K
Input:$1.20 / 1M
Output:$5.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k)Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k)
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot AI
Context window Winner200K512K
Input price ($/1M) Winner$5.00$1.20
Output price ($/1M) Winner$25.00$5.00
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$17.50 $3.70
Released TieTie2026-072026-07
Tokenizerclaude-4kimi

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k) - Key features

Anthropic's flagship Opus-class model for July 2026. Opus 5 pairs Mythos-class reasoning with the Opus price point, adds adaptive effort control and a hardened long-horizon agent loop that holds context across day-long tasks.

  • Adaptive effort control (low to max)
  • Best-in-class agentic coding
  • Compaction-aware 200K context
  • Native tool search and skills
  • Interleaved thinking with tool use

Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k) - Key features

The low-latency hosted tier of Kimi K3.7. Same weights, dedicated high-throughput serving, roughly double the price and a large jump in tokens per second.

  • Turbo serving tier
  • 512K token context window
  • Very high tokens per second
  • Same weights as K3.7
  • Priority capacity

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.