Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k) vs Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k)

by Anthropic
Context:200K
Input:$5.00 / 1M
Output:$25.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M)

by Meta
Context:2M
Input:$1.20 / 1M
Output:$4.00 / 1M
Released:2026-06

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k)Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M)
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Context window Winner200K2M
Input price ($/1M) Winner$5.00$1.20
Output price ($/1M) Winner$25.00$4.00
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$17.50 $3.20
Released Winner2026-072026-06
Tokenizerclaude-4llama

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k) - Key features

Anthropic's flagship Opus-class model for July 2026. Opus 5 pairs Mythos-class reasoning with the Opus price point, adds adaptive effort control and a hardened long-horizon agent loop that holds context across day-long tasks.

  • Adaptive effort control (low to max)
  • Best-in-class agentic coding
  • Compaction-aware 200K context
  • Native tool search and skills
  • Interleaved thinking with tool use

Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M) - Key features

Meta's largest released model, positioned against closed frontier systems. Behemoth is served through partners rather than being practical to self-host, and it leads open-weight benchmarks on reasoning and math.

  • Largest open-weight model to date
  • 2M token context window
  • Frontier-level reasoning and math
  • Mixture-of-experts
  • Partner-hosted inference

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.