Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k) vs Alibaba Qwen 3.8 (256k)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k)

by Anthropic
Context:200K
Input:$5.00 / 1M
Output:$25.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Alibaba Qwen 3.8 (256k)

by Alibaba
Context:256K
Input:$0.90 / 1M
Output:$3.60 / 1M
Released:2026-07

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k)Alibaba Qwen 3.8 (256k)
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
Context window Winner200K256K
Input price ($/1M) Winner$5.00$0.90
Output price ($/1M) Winner$25.00$3.60
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$17.50 $2.70
Released TieTie2026-072026-07
Tokenizerclaude-4qwen

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Alibaba Qwen 3.8 (256k) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k) - Key features

Anthropic's flagship Opus-class model for July 2026. Opus 5 pairs Mythos-class reasoning with the Opus price point, adds adaptive effort control and a hardened long-horizon agent loop that holds context across day-long tasks.

  • Adaptive effort control (low to max)
  • Best-in-class agentic coding
  • Compaction-aware 200K context
  • Native tool search and skills
  • Interleaved thinking with tool use

Alibaba Qwen 3.8 (256k) - Key features

Alibaba's Qwen 3.8 flagship. A sparse MoE model with 256K context, first-class support for more than 100 languages and a notable jump in tool-calling reliability over Qwen 3.

  • 256K token context window
  • 100+ language support
  • Sparse MoE architecture
  • Improved tool calling
  • Open-weight release

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.