Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k) vs Alibaba Qwen 3.8 Coder (1M)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k)

by Anthropic
Context:200K
Input:$5.00 / 1M
Output:$25.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Alibaba Qwen 3.8 Coder (1M)

by Alibaba
Context:1M
Input:$0.50 / 1M
Output:$2.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k)Alibaba Qwen 3.8 Coder (1M)
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
Context window Winner200K1M
Input price ($/1M) Winner$5.00$0.50
Output price ($/1M) Winner$25.00$2.00
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$17.50 $1.50
Released TieTie2026-072026-07
Tokenizerclaude-4qwen

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Alibaba Qwen 3.8 Coder (1M) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (200k) - Key features

Anthropic's flagship Opus-class model for July 2026. Opus 5 pairs Mythos-class reasoning with the Opus price point, adds adaptive effort control and a hardened long-horizon agent loop that holds context across day-long tasks.

  • Adaptive effort control (low to max)
  • Best-in-class agentic coding
  • Compaction-aware 200K context
  • Native tool search and skills
  • Interleaved thinking with tool use

Alibaba Qwen 3.8 Coder (1M) - Key features

The coding-specialised Qwen 3.8 with a 1M token window. Tuned for repository-scale understanding, patch generation and terminal agents.

  • 1M token context window
  • Repository-scale code understanding
  • Patch and diff generation
  • Agentic terminal workflows
  • Open weights

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.