Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M) vs DeepSeek V4.5 (256k)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)

by Anthropic
Context:1M
Input:$3.00 / 1M
Output:$15.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

DeepSeek V4.5 (256k)

by DeepSeek
Context:256K
Input:$0.45 / 1M
Output:$1.80 / 1M
Released:2026-06

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)DeepSeek V4.5 (256k)
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Context window Winner1M256K
Input price ($/1M) Winner$3.00$0.45
Output price ($/1M) Winner$15.00$1.80
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$10.50 $1.35
Released Winner2026-072026-06
Tokenizerclaude-4deepseek

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, DeepSeek V4.5 (256k) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M) - Key features

The workhorse of the Claude 5 family. Sonnet 5 lands close to Opus 4.8 on coding and agentic benchmarks while staying at the long-standing Sonnet price, with a 1M token context window available by default.

  • 1M token context window
  • Near-Opus coding quality
  • Fast time to first token
  • Strong tool use and structured output
  • Batch and caching discounts

DeepSeek V4.5 (256k) - Key features

A mid-cycle refresh of DeepSeek V4 with a doubled context window, better tool calling and a large improvement in multilingual output quality. Still open weights.

  • 256K token context window
  • Improved tool calling
  • Open weights
  • Very low cost per token
  • Mixture-of-experts architecture

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.