Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M) vs Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)

by Anthropic
Context:1M
Input:$3.00 / 1M
Output:$15.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k)

by Moonshot AI
Context:512K
Input:$1.20 / 1M
Output:$5.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k)
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot AI
Context window Winner1M512K
Input price ($/1M) Winner$3.00$1.20
Output price ($/1M) Winner$15.00$5.00
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$10.50 $3.70
Released TieTie2026-072026-07
Tokenizerclaude-4kimi

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M) - Key features

The workhorse of the Claude 5 family. Sonnet 5 lands close to Opus 4.8 on coding and agentic benchmarks while staying at the long-standing Sonnet price, with a 1M token context window available by default.

  • 1M token context window
  • Near-Opus coding quality
  • Fast time to first token
  • Strong tool use and structured output
  • Batch and caching discounts

Moonshot Kimi K3.7 Turbo (512k) - Key features

The low-latency hosted tier of Kimi K3.7. Same weights, dedicated high-throughput serving, roughly double the price and a large jump in tokens per second.

  • Turbo serving tier
  • 512K token context window
  • Very high tokens per second
  • Same weights as K3.7
  • Priority capacity

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.