Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M) vs Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)

by Anthropic
Context:1M
Input:$3.00 / 1M
Output:$15.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M)

by Meta
Context:2M
Input:$1.20 / 1M
Output:$4.00 / 1M
Released:2026-06

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M)
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Context window Winner1M2M
Input price ($/1M) Winner$3.00$1.20
Output price ($/1M) Winner$15.00$4.00
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$10.50 $3.20
Released Winner2026-072026-06
Tokenizerclaude-4llama

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M) - Key features

The workhorse of the Claude 5 family. Sonnet 5 lands close to Opus 4.8 on coding and agentic benchmarks while staying at the long-standing Sonnet price, with a 1M token context window available by default.

  • 1M token context window
  • Near-Opus coding quality
  • Fast time to first token
  • Strong tool use and structured output
  • Batch and caching discounts

Meta Llama 5 Behemoth (2M) - Key features

Meta's largest released model, positioned against closed frontier systems. Behemoth is served through partners rather than being practical to self-host, and it leads open-weight benchmarks on reasoning and math.

  • Largest open-weight model to date
  • 2M token context window
  • Frontier-level reasoning and math
  • Mixture-of-experts
  • Partner-hosted inference

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.