Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M) vs Meta Llama 5 Scout (1M)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)

by Anthropic
Context:1M
Input:$3.00 / 1M
Output:$15.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Meta Llama 5 Scout (1M)

by Meta
Context:1M
Input:$0.15 / 1M
Output:$0.50 / 1M
Released:2026-06

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)Meta Llama 5 Scout (1M)
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Context window TieTie1M1M
Input price ($/1M) Winner$3.00$0.15
Output price ($/1M) Winner$15.00$0.50
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$10.50 $0.40
Released Winner2026-072026-06
Tokenizerclaude-4llama

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Meta Llama 5 Scout (1M) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M) - Key features

The workhorse of the Claude 5 family. Sonnet 5 lands close to Opus 4.8 on coding and agentic benchmarks while staying at the long-standing Sonnet price, with a 1M token context window available by default.

  • 1M token context window
  • Near-Opus coding quality
  • Fast time to first token
  • Strong tool use and structured output
  • Batch and caching discounts

Meta Llama 5 Scout (1M) - Key features

The compact member of the Llama 5 family. Scout runs on a single 24 GB consumer GPU at full speed while keeping a 1M token window and vision input, which makes it the practical choice for local and edge work.

  • 1M token context window
  • Runs on a single 24 GB GPU
  • Vision-language model
  • Open weights
  • Edge and local friendly

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.