Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M) vs Alibaba Qwen 3.8 (256k)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)

by Anthropic
Context:1M
Input:$3.00 / 1M
Output:$15.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Alibaba Qwen 3.8 (256k)

by Alibaba
Context:256K
Input:$0.90 / 1M
Output:$3.60 / 1M
Released:2026-07

Detailed Comparison

DimensionAnthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)Alibaba Qwen 3.8 (256k)
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
Context window Winner1M256K
Input price ($/1M) Winner$3.00$0.90
Output price ($/1M) Winner$15.00$3.60
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$10.50 $2.70
Released TieTie2026-072026-07
Tokenizerclaude-4qwen

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Alibaba Qwen 3.8 (256k) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 (1M) - Key features

The workhorse of the Claude 5 family. Sonnet 5 lands close to Opus 4.8 on coding and agentic benchmarks while staying at the long-standing Sonnet price, with a 1M token context window available by default.

  • 1M token context window
  • Near-Opus coding quality
  • Fast time to first token
  • Strong tool use and structured output
  • Batch and caching discounts

Alibaba Qwen 3.8 (256k) - Key features

Alibaba's Qwen 3.8 flagship. A sparse MoE model with 256K context, first-class support for more than 100 languages and a notable jump in tool-calling reliability over Qwen 3.

  • 256K token context window
  • 100+ language support
  • Sparse MoE architecture
  • Improved tool calling
  • Open-weight release

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.