OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol (1M) vs Google Gemini 3.6 Flash (1M)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, capabilities, and a real-cost sample workload.

Option A

OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol (1M)

by OpenAI
Context:1M
Input:$12.00 / 1M
Output:$72.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07
Option B

Google Gemini 3.6 Flash (1M)

by Google
Context:1M
Input:$0.50 / 1M
Output:$3.00 / 1M
Released:2026-07

Detailed Comparison

DimensionOpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol (1M)Google Gemini 3.6 Flash (1M)
ProviderOpenAIGoogle
Context window TieTie1M1M
Input price ($/1M) Winner$12.00$0.50
Output price ($/1M) Winner$72.00$3.00
Sample workload cost Winner
1M input + 500K output tokens
$48.00 $2.00
Released TieTie2026-072026-07
Tokenizero200k_basegemini

The verdict

On the dimensions we measured, Google Gemini 3.6 Flash (1M) wins more often - particularly on cost-effectiveness for a typical 1M+0.5M workload.

OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol (1M) - Key features

OpenAI's Sol tier for GPT-5.6: a long-thinking configuration that spends far more reasoning tokens per request and tops OpenAI's own agentic and math evaluations. Priced as a premium reasoning endpoint.

  • Extended reasoning by default
  • ~1M token context window
  • 128K max output tokens
  • Parallel tool calling
  • Priority processing tier

Google Gemini 3.6 Flash (1M) - Key features

The fast, cheap tier of Gemini 3.6. Flash keeps a 1M token window and multimodal input while running several times faster than Pro, which makes it the default choice for high-volume production traffic.

  • 1M token context window
  • Very high throughput
  • Multimodal input (text, image, audio, video)
  • Context caching
  • Thinking budget control

How to choose

Estimate the real cost of either model for your prompts using our Token Calculator.